<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 918 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 4,13,16,517/- to the declared value of sales. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reassess the deduction under Section 80G based on the evidence submitted by the assessee. It was noted that the lower authorities had relied on suspicion and presumption without substantial evidence to justify their decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 918 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Rs. 4,13,16,517/- to the declared value of sales. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reassess the deduction under Section 80G based on the evidence submitted by the assessee. It was noted that the lower authorities had relied on suspicion and presumption without substantial evidence to justify their decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>