<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque Dishonor Case: Charges Dropped as No Evidence Accused Managed Company&#039;s Business at Offense Time.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15245</link>
    <description>Dishonour of cheque - There is no averment that the two accused herein were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the time the offence was committed. - proceedings dropped - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:51:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:51:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Dishonor Case: Charges Dropped as No Evidence Accused Managed Company&#039;s Business at Offense Time.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15245</link>
      <description>Dishonour of cheque - There is no averment that the two accused herein were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the time the offence was committed. - proceedings dropped - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:51:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>