https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238457 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on certain issues, including the denial of CENVAT credit on renting immovable property and the classification of electricity as goods. The judgment required the appellant to make a specific pre-deposit within a set period, addressing the disputes over service tax on construction services, electricity charges, and fit-out charges. The decision balanced the interests of both parties by considering relevant case law and legal arguments, resulting in a fair and reasoned outcome. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238457 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on certain issues, including the denial of CENVAT credit on renting immovable property and the classification of electricity as goods. The judgment required the appellant to make a specific pre-deposit within a set period, addressing the disputes over service tax on construction services, electricity charges, and fit-out charges. The decision balanced the interests of both parties by considering relevant case law and legal arguments, resulting in a fair and reasoned outcome. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238457