https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238454 The delay of 29 days in preferring an appeal was condoned by the court due to the circumstances involving the legal department and panel counsel of the Northern Railway. Despite no wholly satisfactory cause for the delay, the judge considered potential harm to the public body if the appeal was rejected solely for the delay. The court ordered the appellant to deposit Rs.1000/- within three weeks, failing which would lead to dismissal of the condonation of delay application and the appeal itself. The appellant's counsel acknowledged the order, and a future hearing was scheduled for compliance verification. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238454 The delay of 29 days in preferring an appeal was condoned by the court due to the circumstances involving the legal department and panel counsel of the Northern Railway. Despite no wholly satisfactory cause for the delay, the judge considered potential harm to the public body if the appeal was rejected solely for the delay. The court ordered the appellant to deposit Rs.1000/- within three weeks, failing which would lead to dismissal of the condonation of delay application and the appeal itself. The appellant's counsel acknowledged the order, and a future hearing was scheduled for compliance verification. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238454