https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238449 Where no statute confers exclusive jurisdiction on a particular criminal forum, transfer of a Foreign Exchange Regulation Act prosecution to another competent court is not unlawful merely because the forum changes. The change of court does not extinguish the accused's substantive right of appeal, since that right remains available before the appropriate appellate court, and revision is not a vested entitlement because revisional jurisdiction is discretionary. The High Court may support transfer through its administrative and criminal procedural powers where administrative exigency, common accused, witnesses, and evidence justify it. On that basis, the transfer was treated as valid and no legally cognisable prejudice was shown. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238449 Where no statute confers exclusive jurisdiction on a particular criminal forum, transfer of a Foreign Exchange Regulation Act prosecution to another competent court is not unlawful merely because the forum changes. The change of court does not extinguish the accused's substantive right of appeal, since that right remains available before the appropriate appellate court, and revision is not a vested entitlement because revisional jurisdiction is discretionary. The High Court may support transfer through its administrative and criminal procedural powers where administrative exigency, common accused, witnesses, and evidence justify it. On that basis, the transfer was treated as valid and no legally cognisable prejudice was shown. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238449