<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 903 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238448</link>
    <description>Under the EPCG scheme, export obligation fixed in US dollars is to be computed with the exchange rate prevailing on the date the licence is issued, because that rate is used only to convert the CIF value into foreign currency when the obligation is set. The obligation is then to be discharged in freely convertible currency, so it cannot later be reworked by applying the exchange rate on the date of export. A subsequent policy circular could not be applied retrospectively to exports already completed or substantially performed. The attempt to recompute the obligation on the export-date rate was therefore inconsistent with the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 903 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238448</link>
      <description>Under the EPCG scheme, export obligation fixed in US dollars is to be computed with the exchange rate prevailing on the date the licence is issued, because that rate is used only to convert the CIF value into foreign currency when the obligation is set. The obligation is then to be discharged in freely convertible currency, so it cannot later be reworked by applying the exchange rate on the date of export. A subsequent policy circular could not be applied retrospectively to exports already completed or substantially performed. The attempt to recompute the obligation on the export-date rate was therefore inconsistent with the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>