<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 901 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238446</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the tribunal, dismissing the appeal and affirming the penalty imposed on the appellant for causing revenue loss. The tribunal clarified its lack of authority to review its own order and rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding personal involvement in the transaction, emphasizing that signing blank forms and cheques could not be considered acting in good faith. The High Court dismissed the appeal against the tribunal&#039;s order and suggested the appellant file a suitable application before the tribunal for further consideration, which was subsequently rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 901 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238446</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the tribunal, dismissing the appeal and affirming the penalty imposed on the appellant for causing revenue loss. The tribunal clarified its lack of authority to review its own order and rejected the appellant&#039;s argument regarding personal involvement in the transaction, emphasizing that signing blank forms and cheques could not be considered acting in good faith. The High Court dismissed the appeal against the tribunal&#039;s order and suggested the appellant file a suitable application before the tribunal for further consideration, which was subsequently rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>