<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 879 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the tax assessment on the amount received by the assessee under an arbitrator&#039;s award related to loss of tools and equipment during business activities, citing Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act and a prior judicial decision. The judgment clarified the tax treatment under Section 44BB, emphasizing the distinction between income types. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on precedent, particularly the case of CIT vs. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc., influenced the decision. The appellant&#039;s submission led to the Tribunal&#039;s order, which was upheld by the High Court upon appeal dismissal due to failure to contest the initial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 879 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the tax assessment on the amount received by the assessee under an arbitrator&#039;s award related to loss of tools and equipment during business activities, citing Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act and a prior judicial decision. The judgment clarified the tax treatment under Section 44BB, emphasizing the distinction between income types. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on precedent, particularly the case of CIT vs. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc., influenced the decision. The appellant&#039;s submission led to the Tribunal&#039;s order, which was upheld by the High Court upon appeal dismissal due to failure to contest the initial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>