<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 870 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the disallowance of commission payments was based on estimation and did not establish concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not warranted, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 870 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the disallowance of commission payments was based on estimation and did not establish concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not warranted, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>