<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 494 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158372</link>
    <description>A taxing notification granting exemption for canteen sales of food and drinks was construed to apply to the turnover attributable to those specified sales, subject to the prescribed limit, rather than to the co-operative society&#039;s entire business turnover. The exempt sales had to be identified and deducted from the dealer&#039;s total turnover for sales tax purposes, and not clubbed with unrelated business receipts. On that construction, the canteen operated as a separate exempt activity for the limited purpose of the notification, and recovery proceedings based on inclusion of those sales could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:57:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 494 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158372</link>
      <description>A taxing notification granting exemption for canteen sales of food and drinks was construed to apply to the turnover attributable to those specified sales, subject to the prescribed limit, rather than to the co-operative society&#039;s entire business turnover. The exempt sales had to be identified and deducted from the dealer&#039;s total turnover for sales tax purposes, and not clubbed with unrelated business receipts. On that construction, the canteen operated as a separate exempt activity for the limited purpose of the notification, and recovery proceedings based on inclusion of those sales could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>