<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 260 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158367</link>
    <description>Statutory limitation for reassessment under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act was treated as suspended for the period during which High Court injunctions restrained the assessing authority, so that period had to be excluded from computation. A fresh assessment made within the extended time limit, following an earlier Tribunal order that allowed reassessment if permitted by law, was therefore valid; the original initiation notice also remained effective because it had not been expressly annulled. The assessment was further found free from breach of natural justice, bias, or absence of reasons, as the applicant had notice, an opportunity to be heard on limitation, and a recorded explanation of the relevant legal effect. The challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 260 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158367</link>
      <description>Statutory limitation for reassessment under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act was treated as suspended for the period during which High Court injunctions restrained the assessing authority, so that period had to be excluded from computation. A fresh assessment made within the extended time limit, following an earlier Tribunal order that allowed reassessment if permitted by law, was therefore valid; the original initiation notice also remained effective because it had not been expressly annulled. The assessment was further found free from breach of natural justice, bias, or absence of reasons, as the applicant had notice, an opportunity to be heard on limitation, and a recorded explanation of the relevant legal effect. The challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>