<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 360 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158360</link>
    <description>Cancellation of an eligibility certificate was found unsustainable because the authority did not afford a reasonable hearing after receiving the Law Department&#039;s opinion, amounting to breach of natural justice. The Court treated the defect as one in the decision-making process and reiterated that judicial review under Article 226 examines the legality of that process, not a reappraisal of the merits. The matter was remitted to the authority to hear the petitioner afresh and pass a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:05:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 360 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158360</link>
      <description>Cancellation of an eligibility certificate was found unsustainable because the authority did not afford a reasonable hearing after receiving the Law Department&#039;s opinion, amounting to breach of natural justice. The Court treated the defect as one in the decision-making process and reiterated that judicial review under Article 226 examines the legality of that process, not a reappraisal of the merits. The matter was remitted to the authority to hear the petitioner afresh and pass a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>