<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 288 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158358</link>
    <description>Section 19(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 permits reassessment only where there is escaped turnover, under-assessment, assessment at a lower rate, or wrong deduction, and it cannot be used to revisit a completed assessment merely because a later judicial decision has made the earlier assessment appear erroneous. The provision requires a real jurisdictional link between the stated ground and the alleged under-assessment. Where the issue is that an earlier assessment has become erroneous and prejudicial to revenue because of a subsequent final judgment or order, section 19-A(1) is the specific provision. Notices issued under section 19(1) without satisfying these conditions were invalid and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:56:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 288 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158358</link>
      <description>Section 19(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 permits reassessment only where there is escaped turnover, under-assessment, assessment at a lower rate, or wrong deduction, and it cannot be used to revisit a completed assessment merely because a later judicial decision has made the earlier assessment appear erroneous. The provision requires a real jurisdictional link between the stated ground and the alleged under-assessment. Where the issue is that an earlier assessment has become erroneous and prejudicial to revenue because of a subsequent final judgment or order, section 19-A(1) is the specific provision. Notices issued under section 19(1) without satisfying these conditions were invalid and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>