<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 864 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238409</link>
    <description>A composition scheme under the U.P. Trade Tax Act operates on an agreed tax substitute in lieu of tax otherwise payable, so a circular cannot require additional payment of State Development Tax unless there is a genuine change in the rate of tax. The text states that State Development Tax under Section 3-H was treated as an independent levy, not an altered rate of existing tax, making the circular unsustainable. It further states that related demand orders for the assessment years concerned could not stand in their present form, while the revenue authorities retained liberty to proceed in accordance with law through fresh notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 864 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238409</link>
      <description>A composition scheme under the U.P. Trade Tax Act operates on an agreed tax substitute in lieu of tax otherwise payable, so a circular cannot require additional payment of State Development Tax unless there is a genuine change in the rate of tax. The text states that State Development Tax under Section 3-H was treated as an independent levy, not an altered rate of existing tax, making the circular unsustainable. It further states that related demand orders for the assessment years concerned could not stand in their present form, while the revenue authorities retained liberty to proceed in accordance with law through fresh notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>