<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 852 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on 10% of the consignment classified as sawn woods under CTH 4407.29. However, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods, fine of Rs. 35,000, and penalty of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the appellant, as there was no intent to evade customs duty due to the majority of the consignment being correctly declared.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 852 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on 10% of the consignment classified as sawn woods under CTH 4407.29. However, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods, fine of Rs. 35,000, and penalty of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the appellant, as there was no intent to evade customs duty due to the majority of the consignment being correctly declared.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>