https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238389 The judge in the case addressed the eligibility of the appellant for CENVAT credit on materials used for supporting structures and equipment connections. While acknowledging precedents cited by the appellant's counsel, the judge emphasized the timely issuance of a show-cause notice and the relevance of a previous Larger Bench decision. The judge allowed a portion of the denied credit due to the varied usage of materials, directing the appellant to deposit 50% within six weeks. Compliance would lead to a waiver and stay against recovery, highlighting the importance of case-specific analysis and compliance with tribunal directives in tax credit matters. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238389 The judge in the case addressed the eligibility of the appellant for CENVAT credit on materials used for supporting structures and equipment connections. While acknowledging precedents cited by the appellant's counsel, the judge emphasized the timely issuance of a show-cause notice and the relevance of a previous Larger Bench decision. The judge allowed a portion of the denied credit due to the varied usage of materials, directing the appellant to deposit 50% within six weeks. Compliance would lead to a waiver and stay against recovery, highlighting the importance of case-specific analysis and compliance with tribunal directives in tax credit matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238389