<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 843 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, regarding the refund of accumulated credit on various input services. The decision was based on the department&#039;s inconsistent stance, contradictory orders by the same Commissioner, and previous Tribunal rulings favoring the appellant. The Tribunal concluded that there was no need for further delay and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 843 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, regarding the refund of accumulated credit on various input services. The decision was based on the department&#039;s inconsistent stance, contradictory orders by the same Commissioner, and previous Tribunal rulings favoring the appellant. The Tribunal concluded that there was no need for further delay and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>