https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238387 The tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the demand for excise duty on transportation charges and dismissing the relevance of old case laws under the previous Section 4. The plea of time-bar was rejected due to insufficient disclosure in the ER-1 returns. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 4 crore within eight weeks for the stay of recovery, emphasizing compliance with the revised provisions of the Central Excise Act. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238387 The tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the demand for excise duty on transportation charges and dismissing the relevance of old case laws under the previous Section 4. The plea of time-bar was rejected due to insufficient disclosure in the ER-1 returns. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 4 crore within eight weeks for the stay of recovery, emphasizing compliance with the revised provisions of the Central Excise Act. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238387