https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238386 The Tribunal upheld the Final Order, rejecting the appellants' request for rectification of mistake. It affirmed the invocation of the extended period for duty demand, considering the classification of the glazing system and excise duty liability. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cooperation with the Department for verification and dismissed the appellants' application for Review of Order on Merits (ROM), finding no evident mistake and underscoring the necessity of thorough discussion to contest the decision. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238386 The Tribunal upheld the Final Order, rejecting the appellants' request for rectification of mistake. It affirmed the invocation of the extended period for duty demand, considering the classification of the glazing system and excise duty liability. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cooperation with the Department for verification and dismissed the appellants' application for Review of Order on Merits (ROM), finding no evident mistake and underscoring the necessity of thorough discussion to contest the decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238386