<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 834 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the stockbroker, overturning the disallowance of the claimed business loss for write off of debts owed by clients. The Tribunal emphasized that the write off of bad debts in the accounts was sufficient for claiming a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, unless proven otherwise. It found the Revenue&#039;s objections unsubstantiated and criticized the lower authority for not considering the material on record. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of the claimed business loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 834 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the stockbroker, overturning the disallowance of the claimed business loss for write off of debts owed by clients. The Tribunal emphasized that the write off of bad debts in the accounts was sufficient for claiming a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, unless proven otherwise. It found the Revenue&#039;s objections unsubstantiated and criticized the lower authority for not considering the material on record. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of the claimed business loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>