<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 832 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238377</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s determination of the Annual Ratable Value (ARV) for the Nepean Sea Road property at Rs. 4,60,200 per annum, based on market rent considerations. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the disallowance of electricity and society maintenance charges related to the rented property, assessing the income under the head &quot;Income from House Property&quot; instead of &quot;Income from Business and Profession.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized the primary intention of the assessee to earn rental income, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the tax liability decisions by the AO and the First Appellate Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 832 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238377</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s determination of the Annual Ratable Value (ARV) for the Nepean Sea Road property at Rs. 4,60,200 per annum, based on market rent considerations. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the disallowance of electricity and society maintenance charges related to the rented property, assessing the income under the head &quot;Income from House Property&quot; instead of &quot;Income from Business and Profession.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized the primary intention of the assessee to earn rental income, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the tax liability decisions by the AO and the First Appellate Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>