<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 392 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158347</link>
    <description>Section 35 of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 operates as a machinery provision for collection of tax on works contracts, not as a charging provision. The charging incidence remains under section 9, while the statutory definitions and exclusions continue to govern taxable turnover and exempt transactions. Deduction at source is therefore an advance collection mechanism, adjustable against the contractor&#039;s assessed liability, and harsh operation in particular cases does not by itself invalidate the provision. The provision was treated as within State legislative competence and constitutionally valid, with the challenge failing because it did not enlarge the charging scheme or transgress the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 392 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158347</link>
      <description>Section 35 of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 operates as a machinery provision for collection of tax on works contracts, not as a charging provision. The charging incidence remains under section 9, while the statutory definitions and exclusions continue to govern taxable turnover and exempt transactions. Deduction at source is therefore an advance collection mechanism, adjustable against the contractor&#039;s assessed liability, and harsh operation in particular cases does not by itself invalidate the provision. The provision was treated as within State legislative competence and constitutionally valid, with the challenge failing because it did not enlarge the charging scheme or transgress the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>