<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 407 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158342</link>
    <description>A taxing provision dealing with works contracts was considered valid where, on its own terms, it did not authorise taxation beyond the State&#039;s constitutional competence over inter-State sales, outside sales, import or export sales. The Orissa Sales Tax Act definitions and charging provisions were treated as having internal safeguards, and the scheme was not struck down merely because disputes could arise in individual transactions. A pre-assessment show cause notice was also treated as premature for challenge because liability had not been finally determined and the assessee could raise all legal and factual objections before the assessing authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 407 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158342</link>
      <description>A taxing provision dealing with works contracts was considered valid where, on its own terms, it did not authorise taxation beyond the State&#039;s constitutional competence over inter-State sales, outside sales, import or export sales. The Orissa Sales Tax Act definitions and charging provisions were treated as having internal safeguards, and the scheme was not struck down merely because disputes could arise in individual transactions. A pre-assessment show cause notice was also treated as premature for challenge because liability had not been finally determined and the assessee could raise all legal and factual objections before the assessing authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>