https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158339 The Court upheld the Tribunal's orders, confirming Andhra Pradesh's jurisdiction to collect CST on inter-State sales by BHEL's Hyderabad unit. It dismissed writ petitions seeking to quash the Tribunal's order or declare lack of jurisdiction. The Court refrained from directing other states to refund or transfer CST collected illegally, citing lack of territorial jurisdiction and pending Supreme Court proceedings. It concluded that the Supreme Court should determine the appropriate directions to states, dismissing the writ petitions without costs. en-us Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:50:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158339 The Court upheld the Tribunal's orders, confirming Andhra Pradesh's jurisdiction to collect CST on inter-State sales by BHEL's Hyderabad unit. It dismissed writ petitions seeking to quash the Tribunal's order or declare lack of jurisdiction. The Court refrained from directing other states to refund or transfer CST collected illegally, citing lack of territorial jurisdiction and pending Supreme Court proceedings. It concluded that the Supreme Court should determine the appropriate directions to states, dismissing the writ petitions without costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158339