<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158332</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the termination of a temporary Assistant Surgeon Grade I due to lack of prior communication on performance issues, emphasizing the need for fairness in employment relationships. The Court highlighted the employee&#039;s legitimate expectation of continued employment and the importance of communicating deficiencies before termination. While acknowledging the principle that no inquiry is required for unsuitability, the Court stressed the necessity of advance communication for fairness. The appellant&#039;s termination was deemed arbitrary and unfair, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and reinstatement unless services were regularized according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:23:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158332</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the termination of a temporary Assistant Surgeon Grade I due to lack of prior communication on performance issues, emphasizing the need for fairness in employment relationships. The Court highlighted the employee&#039;s legitimate expectation of continued employment and the importance of communicating deficiencies before termination. While acknowledging the principle that no inquiry is required for unsuitability, the Court stressed the necessity of advance communication for fairness. The appellant&#039;s termination was deemed arbitrary and unfair, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and reinstatement unless services were regularized according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>