<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 330 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158328</link>
    <description>Section 8 of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was treated as an enabling provision that permits set-off only subject to prescribed restrictions and conditions. Rule 20-C(1)(ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 was therefore held to be supplementary to the Act and not inconsistent with it, because the rule-making power under section 51(2)(c) authorises the State to prescribe the manner and limits of set-off. The restriction confining set-off on tax-paid raw material to goods manufactured and sold within Madhya Pradesh, in inter-State trade or commerce, or by export, was upheld as a valid condition, and set-off on sales made outside the State through commission agents was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:59:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 330 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158328</link>
      <description>Section 8 of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was treated as an enabling provision that permits set-off only subject to prescribed restrictions and conditions. Rule 20-C(1)(ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 was therefore held to be supplementary to the Act and not inconsistent with it, because the rule-making power under section 51(2)(c) authorises the State to prescribe the manner and limits of set-off. The restriction confining set-off on tax-paid raw material to goods manufactured and sold within Madhya Pradesh, in inter-State trade or commerce, or by export, was upheld as a valid condition, and set-off on sales made outside the State through commission agents was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>