<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 492 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158323</link>
    <description>Tax and penalty cannot be collected from dealers without a lawful assessment or other statutory authority, and a demand raised solely on inspection material and recorded statements was held illegal and unsustainable. The court rejected reliance on the composition-of-offences provision because the amounts were not demanded as composition and the five-times penalty could not be justified under that provision. Separately, a cash remittance was not accepted as having been made under coercion, as the contemporaneous documents and surrounding circumstances pointed to a voluntary deposit. The respondents were left free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 492 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158323</link>
      <description>Tax and penalty cannot be collected from dealers without a lawful assessment or other statutory authority, and a demand raised solely on inspection material and recorded statements was held illegal and unsustainable. The court rejected reliance on the composition-of-offences provision because the amounts were not demanded as composition and the five-times penalty could not be justified under that provision. Separately, a cash remittance was not accepted as having been made under coercion, as the contemporaneous documents and surrounding circumstances pointed to a voluntary deposit. The respondents were left free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>