<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 321 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158322</link>
    <description>B.H.C. (Technical) was treated as a pesticide meant for agricultural use under the Pondicherry General Sales Tax Act exemption notification because the notification did not require any minimum strength, dilution, or mixing before exemption applied. The local exemption was therefore sustained. However, the same notification was held not to amount to a general exemption for Central sales tax purposes, because exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act applies only where goods are exempt generally and not merely under conditional or situation-specific relief. The assessee therefore did not qualify for exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:20:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 321 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158322</link>
      <description>B.H.C. (Technical) was treated as a pesticide meant for agricultural use under the Pondicherry General Sales Tax Act exemption notification because the notification did not require any minimum strength, dilution, or mixing before exemption applied. The local exemption was therefore sustained. However, the same notification was held not to amount to a general exemption for Central sales tax purposes, because exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act applies only where goods are exempt generally and not merely under conditional or situation-specific relief. The assessee therefore did not qualify for exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>