https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238356 The Tribunal clarified that the orders dated 20.9.2013 did not involve a stay of realisation of adjudicated liability. Applications seeking extension of these orders were dismissed. The judgment highlighted the applicability of the Central Excise Act 1944 in determining pre-deposit and handling appeals. Section 35F mandates pre-deposit pending appeal, with discretion for waiver. The Tribunal's jurisdiction post pre-deposit is not time-bound. Section 35C sets appeal disposal timelines. The Tribunal has the power to grant stay pending appeal, distinct from waiver of pre-deposit. The judgment provided clarity on these issues, ensuring procedural understanding in the appeals process. en-us Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238356 The Tribunal clarified that the orders dated 20.9.2013 did not involve a stay of realisation of adjudicated liability. Applications seeking extension of these orders were dismissed. The judgment highlighted the applicability of the Central Excise Act 1944 in determining pre-deposit and handling appeals. Section 35F mandates pre-deposit pending appeal, with discretion for waiver. The Tribunal's jurisdiction post pre-deposit is not time-bound. Section 35C sets appeal disposal timelines. The Tribunal has the power to grant stay pending appeal, distinct from waiver of pre-deposit. The judgment provided clarity on these issues, ensuring procedural understanding in the appeals process. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238356