https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238355 The Tribunal found merit in the Revenue's submissions regarding the applicant's activities as a de facto contractor. However, discrepancies in the facts presented were noted, requiring further examination during the appeal. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.18,00,000 within eight weeks, with balance dues predeposit waived and recovery stayed during the appeal. The decision indicated partial acceptance of the Revenue's arguments while allowing for a detailed examination of the case during the appeal process. en-us Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238355 The Tribunal found merit in the Revenue's submissions regarding the applicant's activities as a de facto contractor. However, discrepancies in the facts presented were noted, requiring further examination during the appeal. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.18,00,000 within eight weeks, with balance dues predeposit waived and recovery stayed during the appeal. The decision indicated partial acceptance of the Revenue's arguments while allowing for a detailed examination of the case during the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 07 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238355