<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 804 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed a pre-deposit for admission of appeal to examine whether the absence of one process could disqualify goods as finished leather. The Tribunal acknowledged the lack of notice regarding penalty increment, allowing the applicant to challenge the CLRI report. A pre-deposit of Rs.1,20,000 was ordered for appeal admission, with remaining dues waived upon compliance, and recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal, emphasizing fair consideration of the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 804 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed a pre-deposit for admission of appeal to examine whether the absence of one process could disqualify goods as finished leather. The Tribunal acknowledged the lack of notice regarding penalty increment, allowing the applicant to challenge the CLRI report. A pre-deposit of Rs.1,20,000 was ordered for appeal admission, with remaining dues waived upon compliance, and recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal, emphasizing fair consideration of the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>