<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 802 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, allowing eligibility of CENVAT credit on Education Cesses paid on CVD and Additional Customs Duty under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act for inputs received from 100% EOUs during April &#039;07 to September &#039;09. The Tribunal found that the applicants had availed the credit correctly as per the specified formula in the Rules, emphasizing that CVD covers various duties including those under the Customs Tariff Act and Education Cesses. The Tribunal granted stay of recovery of dues, waived pre-deposit, and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 802 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, allowing eligibility of CENVAT credit on Education Cesses paid on CVD and Additional Customs Duty under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act for inputs received from 100% EOUs during April &#039;07 to September &#039;09. The Tribunal found that the applicants had availed the credit correctly as per the specified formula in the Rules, emphasizing that CVD covers various duties including those under the Customs Tariff Act and Education Cesses. The Tribunal granted stay of recovery of dues, waived pre-deposit, and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>