https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238340 Prima facie penalty was considered maintainable in a matter involving alleged issuance of bogus Cenvatable invoices, including for the period before 01.03.2007, on the view that a person purporting to sell goods while issuing invoices without actual supply could fall within Rule 25(1)(d) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. On that basis, total waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellant was granted only conditional relief, with waiver of the balance penalty and stay of recovery subject to compliance with the directed deposit. en-us Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238340 Prima facie penalty was considered maintainable in a matter involving alleged issuance of bogus Cenvatable invoices, including for the period before 01.03.2007, on the view that a person purporting to sell goods while issuing invoices without actual supply could fall within Rule 25(1)(d) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. On that basis, total waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellant was granted only conditional relief, with waiver of the balance penalty and stay of recovery subject to compliance with the directed deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238340