<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 785 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to refer the property valuation matter to the DVO and to allow legal expenses under Section 57(iii) if substantiated. The classification of income and disallowance of business expenses and expenses related to capital gains were upheld based on the CIT(A) and AO&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 785 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to refer the property valuation matter to the DVO and to allow legal expenses under Section 57(iii) if substantiated. The classification of income and disallowance of business expenses and expenses related to capital gains were upheld based on the CIT(A) and AO&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>