<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 772 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238317</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of interest on borrowed funds used for advance tax payment, citing the availability of sufficient own funds to cover the tax liability. On the other hand, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the disallowance of expenses under section 14-A read with Rule 8-D, upholding the 5% restriction on exempt income as per previous decisions and the law&#039;s prospective application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 772 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238317</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of interest on borrowed funds used for advance tax payment, citing the availability of sufficient own funds to cover the tax liability. On the other hand, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the disallowance of expenses under section 14-A read with Rule 8-D, upholding the 5% restriction on exempt income as per previous decisions and the law&#039;s prospective application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>