<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 754 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238299</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals for AYs 2002-03 to 2004-05, citing that the AO is not limited to search material alone based on a jurisdictional High Court decision. Regarding the addition of capital introduced by partners and withdrawals from the firm, the ITAT remitted the matters back to the AO for further examination, allowing the assessee an opportunity to present additional evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 754 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238299</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals for AYs 2002-03 to 2004-05, citing that the AO is not limited to search material alone based on a jurisdictional High Court decision. Regarding the addition of capital introduced by partners and withdrawals from the firm, the ITAT remitted the matters back to the AO for further examination, allowing the assessee an opportunity to present additional evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>