<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 750 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238295</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed both departmental appeals for AY 1993-94 and AY 1994-95, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The ITAT emphasized the importance of factual evidence and rejected additions based on estimates and uncorroborated statements in various income assessment matters, including income from refund rackets, Hawala transactions, consultancy income, interest, and dividend income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=332877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 750 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238295</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed both departmental appeals for AY 1993-94 and AY 1994-95, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The ITAT emphasized the importance of factual evidence and rejected additions based on estimates and uncorroborated statements in various income assessment matters, including income from refund rackets, Hawala transactions, consultancy income, interest, and dividend income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>