<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 739 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238284</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit taken on debit notes was supported by documents showing the service tax liability, the service provider&#039;s registration details, and payment of tax to the provider, so waiver of pre-deposit was granted for the balance demand and recovery was stayed pending appeal. However, one instance of excess credit of Rs. 12,629 was identified, and reversal of that limited amount was required as a condition for relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=331560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 739 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238284</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit taken on debit notes was supported by documents showing the service tax liability, the service provider&#039;s registration details, and payment of tax to the provider, so waiver of pre-deposit was granted for the balance demand and recovery was stayed pending appeal. However, one instance of excess credit of Rs. 12,629 was identified, and reversal of that limited amount was required as a condition for relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>