<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238278</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order. It affirmed the blacklisting but directed BSNL to determine the period of blacklisting afresh based on guidelines to be formulated. The guidelines should prescribe different periods of debarment depending on the gravity of the offenses to ensure objectivity and transparency. The needful should be done within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=331554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238278</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order. It affirmed the blacklisting but directed BSNL to determine the period of blacklisting afresh based on guidelines to be formulated. The guidelines should prescribe different periods of debarment depending on the gravity of the offenses to ensure objectivity and transparency. The needful should be done within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>