<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 478 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158243</link>
    <description>A sale of ghee was examined to determine whether the movement of goods from Tamil Nadu to Pondicherry made it an inter-State sale under section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act or an intra-State sale under State law. The Tribunal held that the situs of sale was not conclusive; the controlling test was whether inter-State movement was a necessary incident of the sale, and the assessment did not properly apply that principle. It also held that reliance on third-party transport statements without granting a fair opportunity for cross-examination violated natural justice. The assessment order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 478 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158243</link>
      <description>A sale of ghee was examined to determine whether the movement of goods from Tamil Nadu to Pondicherry made it an inter-State sale under section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act or an intra-State sale under State law. The Tribunal held that the situs of sale was not conclusive; the controlling test was whether inter-State movement was a necessary incident of the sale, and the assessment did not properly apply that principle. It also held that reliance on third-party transport statements without granting a fair opportunity for cross-examination violated natural justice. The assessment order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>