<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 384 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158242</link>
    <description>A reference under section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was found incapable of determination because the Tribunal&#039;s statement of case did not adequately support the framed question, particularly on whether hose pipes were accessories of pump sets. The Court held that a referred question must arise from and be supported by the Tribunal&#039;s order, and where the statement is insufficient it may invoke section 44(4) to require additions or alterations before answering the reference. The Tribunal was directed to decide the hose pipes issue firmly and, if needed, reshape and re-refer the question after amending the statement of case within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 384 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158242</link>
      <description>A reference under section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was found incapable of determination because the Tribunal&#039;s statement of case did not adequately support the framed question, particularly on whether hose pipes were accessories of pump sets. The Court held that a referred question must arise from and be supported by the Tribunal&#039;s order, and where the statement is insufficient it may invoke section 44(4) to require additions or alterations before answering the reference. The Tribunal was directed to decide the hose pipes issue firmly and, if needed, reshape and re-refer the question after amending the statement of case within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>