<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 189 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158237</link>
    <description>The Karnataka Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1981 excludes Chapter XXXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for scheduled offences, including offences under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, so the general criminal limitation bar cannot defeat cognizance of such prosecutions. In economic offence prosecutions of this kind, mere passage of time does not by itself justify quashing for delay, and asserted factual hardships such as closure of business or accident-related disruption are matters for trial rather than for interference at the threshold under section 482 of the Code. The petitions were therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:34:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 189 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158237</link>
      <description>The Karnataka Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1981 excludes Chapter XXXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for scheduled offences, including offences under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, so the general criminal limitation bar cannot defeat cognizance of such prosecutions. In economic offence prosecutions of this kind, mere passage of time does not by itself justify quashing for delay, and asserted factual hardships such as closure of business or accident-related disruption are matters for trial rather than for interference at the threshold under section 482 of the Code. The petitions were therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>