<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 691 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238236</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the Tax Case (Revision) by deleting the further addition towards probable omission but confirmed the assessment on suppression. The Court disagreed with the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision on the equal time addition for probable omission, emphasizing the significance of maintaining proper records and following legal principles in assessments related to inter-State transactions and omissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 691 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238236</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the Tax Case (Revision) by deleting the further addition towards probable omission but confirmed the assessment on suppression. The Court disagreed with the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision on the equal time addition for probable omission, emphasizing the significance of maintaining proper records and following legal principles in assessments related to inter-State transactions and omissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>