<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 687 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the extended period for demanding service tax should not have been invoked. The appellant had paid service tax on their output services and argued that the tax amount demanded for services received from foreign companies should be allowed to be utilized for their output services. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal granted a waiver and stay against the recovery of the demanded service tax amount, emphasizing the principle of revenue neutrality in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 687 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the extended period for demanding service tax should not have been invoked. The appellant had paid service tax on their output services and argued that the tax amount demanded for services received from foreign companies should be allowed to be utilized for their output services. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal granted a waiver and stay against the recovery of the demanded service tax amount, emphasizing the principle of revenue neutrality in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>