<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 682 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238227</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed for want of Committee on Disputes clearance was sought to be restored after the Supreme Court later waived that requirement in Electronics Corporation of India. The Tribunal noted that the Committee had already considered the matter and expressly refused permission to pursue the appeal remedy. It distinguished cases where clearance applications were still pending from cases where permission had already been declined, and held that the later waiver did not justify restoration in these circumstances. The restoration application was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 682 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238227</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed for want of Committee on Disputes clearance was sought to be restored after the Supreme Court later waived that requirement in Electronics Corporation of India. The Tribunal noted that the Committee had already considered the matter and expressly refused permission to pursue the appeal remedy. It distinguished cases where clearance applications were still pending from cases where permission had already been declined, and held that the later waiver did not justify restoration in these circumstances. The restoration application was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>