<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 342 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158230</link>
    <description>Tax-paid goods under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 are purchases from a registered dealer, and such sales are excluded from taxable turnover. The document states that the issue whether deduction remains available when the selling dealer&#039;s registration is later cancelled, or the dealer is alleged to be bogus or fictitious, is a question of law rather than a mere question of fact. It also notes that where co-equal Benches have taken different views on the same point, the matter should be referred to a larger Bench under the applicable rules. Accordingly, the assessee&#039;s claim required reference of the legal questions for opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:51:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 342 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158230</link>
      <description>Tax-paid goods under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 are purchases from a registered dealer, and such sales are excluded from taxable turnover. The document states that the issue whether deduction remains available when the selling dealer&#039;s registration is later cancelled, or the dealer is alleged to be bogus or fictitious, is a question of law rather than a mere question of fact. It also notes that where co-equal Benches have taken different views on the same point, the matter should be referred to a larger Bench under the applicable rules. Accordingly, the assessee&#039;s claim required reference of the legal questions for opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>