<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 472 -  PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158227</link>
    <description>Processing raw cotton through cleaning, boiling, bleaching, drying, opening, carding, compressing, cutting and packing produces surgical cotton, a commercially distinct commodity with a different name, character and use. It is therefore manufacture, and the product does not remain cotton in its unmanufactured state or continue to fall within the declared goods entry for cotton under the sales tax laws. The commentary also distinguishes reassessment under section 11-A from revision under section 21(1) of the Punjab Act: the former is subject to limitation for fresh factual information, while the latter is a broader revisional power concerning legality or propriety. A later Tribunal decision does not constitute fresh information for section 11-A and does not bar revision under section 21(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:21:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 472 -  PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158227</link>
      <description>Processing raw cotton through cleaning, boiling, bleaching, drying, opening, carding, compressing, cutting and packing produces surgical cotton, a commercially distinct commodity with a different name, character and use. It is therefore manufacture, and the product does not remain cotton in its unmanufactured state or continue to fall within the declared goods entry for cotton under the sales tax laws. The commentary also distinguishes reassessment under section 11-A from revision under section 21(1) of the Punjab Act: the former is subject to limitation for fresh factual information, while the latter is a broader revisional power concerning legality or propriety. A later Tribunal decision does not constitute fresh information for section 11-A and does not bar revision under section 21(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>