<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 676 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to pre-deposit an additional sum of Rs.50,000 within eight weeks, with the balance of the penalty amount of Rs.7 lakhs being waived upon compliance. Recovery was stayed during the appeal process. The decision was based on the applicant&#039;s admission of involvement in the smuggling operation, despite claims of financial hardship and arguments regarding the consideration of crucial evidence by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 676 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to pre-deposit an additional sum of Rs.50,000 within eight weeks, with the balance of the penalty amount of Rs.7 lakhs being waived upon compliance. Recovery was stayed during the appeal process. The decision was based on the applicant&#039;s admission of involvement in the smuggling operation, despite claims of financial hardship and arguments regarding the consideration of crucial evidence by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>