<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 674 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238219</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s applications for rectification of mistake or modification of Final Order, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines under Section 129B of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal noted the absence of provision for modifying final orders under Section 129B(1) and dismissed the applications as time-barred since filed beyond the six-month limit. The decision highlighted the importance of complying with statutory timelines for rectification, ensuring efficient administration of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=330195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 674 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238219</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s applications for rectification of mistake or modification of Final Order, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines under Section 129B of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal noted the absence of provision for modifying final orders under Section 129B(1) and dismissed the applications as time-barred since filed beyond the six-month limit. The decision highlighted the importance of complying with statutory timelines for rectification, ensuring efficient administration of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>