https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238216 Removal of a registered trade mark for non-renewal required prior notice in the prescribed form under the governing statutory scheme; absent that mandatory notice, the removal was invalid and could not stand. Because the mark had been removed without compliance with the prescribed procedure, the one-year restoration limitation did not apply against the applicant. The trade mark was therefore directed to be restored and renewed, subject to payment of charges and compliance with formalities, without prejudice to any third-party claim. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238216 Removal of a registered trade mark for non-renewal required prior notice in the prescribed form under the governing statutory scheme; absent that mandatory notice, the removal was invalid and could not stand. Because the mark had been removed without compliance with the prescribed procedure, the one-year restoration limitation did not apply against the applicant. The trade mark was therefore directed to be restored and renewed, subject to payment of charges and compliance with formalities, without prejudice to any third-party claim. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238216